We are asked to believe that Madonna lives on a luxury houseboat, where she parades in front of the windows naked at all hours, yet somehow doesn't attract a crowd, not even of appreciative lobstermen. There's all kinds of murky plot debris involving nasal spray with cocaine in it, ghosts from the past, bizarre sex, and lots of nudity. What about the story here? It has to be seen to be believed - something I do not advise. She's just an extra trying to grab some extra business.īut enough on the technical side. We in the audience are alerted that the movie is establishing her for a later payoff. One example: Dafoe is addressing his opening remarks to the jury, and the camera pulls focus so that we see an attractive young female juror sitting in the front row. I don't know whether to blame the director, the cinematographer or the editor for some of the inept choices in this movie. That's a typical exchange in the courtroom scenes, which involve Dafoe being reprimanded by the judge for just about every breath he draws. a city small enough, Madonna volunteers from the witness stand, that she once dated a guy who dated a girl who dated Mantegna. Willem Dafoe plays the defense attorney who firmly believes Madonna is innocent, or in any event very sexy, and Joe Mantegna has the Hamilton Burger role. But she's innocent, she protests - and indeed there is another obvious suspect, the millionaire's private secretary ( Anne Archer), who is also his spurned former lover.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |